Biden v. Palin on Roe v. Wade

The good news about Palin: She believes there's an inherent right to privacy in the Constitution.
The bad news about Palin: She has no idea what an inherent right to privacy in the Constitution might actually entail.

Just out of curiosity, what does Palin think happens when states write laws that conflict with the US Constitution? And does she think it involves ponies or kittens? Maybe unicorns?

I'm with Ta-Nehisi Coates on this one:

...Joe Biden answers the same questions right before her, and the difference is, frankly, enraging. I hear a lot about disrespect of Palin by the liberal media. But Palin's entire participation in this process has been an exercise in disrespect for government and the presidency....
This election has now entered the realm of tragicomedy, courtesy of John McCain.

UPDATE: You too can interview Sarah Palin (via the interwebs).

Nothing New byslag at 7:47 PM

2 dispense karmic justice! (or just comment here):

IS LED BY NONE said...

Roe v. Wade is a good law indeed, and Palin is on the wrong side of this issue.

slag said...

is led by none: Great post. I agree completely.

Blogger Template by Blogcrowds